[Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287





--- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>  2008-08-31 11:33:18 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > Well,
> > * I cannot find any notes from the source codes which shows that this software
> > can be
> >   licensed also under CPL. Are there any explicit declaration?
> 
> Yes, it's in their website: http://htmlparser.sourceforge.net/license.html
> 
> I've just investigated into the sources of the 2.0 snapshot and it includes
> only the CPL. Seems they have changed for the new version.
> 
> I'll remove the reference of CPL on 1.6.

Well, this will cause problem as OmegaT is licensed under GPLv2+ while CPL is
incompatible with GPL:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing
Currently htmlparser 1.6 is licensed under GPLv2+ so there is no problem,
however
for OmegaT you cannot use svn snapshot of htmlparser. Would you ask the
upstream
to change the license?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.