[Bug 475884] Review Request: gbdfed - Bitmap Font Editor

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Dec 11 07:25:27 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475884


Parag AN(पराग) <panemade at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |panemade at gmail.com
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |panemade at gmail.com
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+




--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade at gmail.com>  2008-12-11 02:25:26 EDT ---
Review:
+ package builds in mock.
 Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=992670
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM.
+ source files match upstream.
328d87642e89629db351a9c00aa6a8c7  gbdfed-1.4-patch1
97dd44876f83caa5c3ae2c2479d7bff2  gbdfed-1.4.tbz2
28625f0878e83687b4c3a293467fc926  gbdfed16x16.png
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc files present.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ defattr usage is correct.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ no static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage exists.
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available.
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ no scriptlets are used.
+ Desktop file installed correctly.
+ GUI app.

APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list