[Bug 472027] Review Request: onboard - Simple on-screen Keyboard

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Dec 15 05:25:53 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472027


Parag AN(पराग) <panemade at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




--- Comment #10 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade at gmail.com>  2008-12-15 00:25:52 EDT ---
+ is OK
- Needs work

Review:
+ package builds in mock.
 Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=998755
- rpmlint is silent for RPM. But Not for SRPM.
onboard.src: W: strange-permission onboard.spec 0666
==> easy to fix.

+ source files match upstream.
6e0dde122c50dcdfc27fe32b714edf3f  onboard-0.91.2.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc files present.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ defattr usage is correct.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code.
+ no static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage exists.
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available.
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ no scriptlets are used.
+ Desktop files installed correctly.
+ Followed python guidelines.
+ GUI app.

Suggestions:-
  You can ask upstream to include/modify .desktop files as used in this
package.

APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list