[Bug 226333] Merge Review: pygtk2 (stalled)

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Feb 6 14:05:02 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: pygtk2 (stalled)


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226333





------- Additional Comments From tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com  2008-02-06 09:05 EST -------
MUST:
* Package is matching naming guidelines.
* spec file in named %{name}.spec 
* it is legal for Fedora to distribute this
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible have the right good license shortname : LGPLv2+
* License file must be in %doc (it it exists)
* Spec file is written in American English
* Spec file is legible.
* Sources match upstream.
  MD5SUM:
  a816346d750d61e3fa67a200e4292694 
http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/pygtk/2.12/pygtk-2.12.1.tar.bz2
  a816346d750d61e3fa67a200e4292694  pygtk-2.12.1.tar.bz2

* summary and description fine
* correct buildroot
* %{?dist} is used
* license text included in package and marked with %doc
* package meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/)
* changelog format fine 
* Packager/Vendor/Distribution/Copyright tags not used
* Summary tag does not end in a period
* Package compiles and build into RPM's on : i386 etc.
* no Exclude Arch 
* BuildRequires for all build requerements (- the ones on the Exception list)
* no locales 
* no shared libs 
* Package own all created directories.
* No duplicate files in %files 
* Every %files section includes a %defattr(...) line
* Package has a %clean with a rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
* consistently use of macros
* Package contains code or or permissable content.
* Large documentation files goes into -doc subpackage.
* files in %doc dont affect runtime.
* header files goes into -devel subpackage
* no static libs
* package has pkgconfig (.pc) files and has a 'Requires: pkgconfig' 
* -devel subpackage has a 'Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}' 
* *.la libtool archives are removed in spec (if available)
* not a gui application 
* package don't own files and dirs owned by other packages.
* %install starts with an rm -rf %{buildroot} 
* rpm package filenames is in valid UTF-8.
* no Rpath 
* no config files
* no init scripts 
* no %makeinstall used
* no Requires(pre,post)


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list