[Bug 431692] Review Request: libdstr - Dave's String class
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Feb 6 17:23:02 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libdstr - Dave's String class
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431692
------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-06 12:23 EST -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > Well, actually something strange. On my *rawhide* machine,
> > when I manually try "rpmbuild -ba", the compilation log says:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Processing files: libdstr-devel-20080124-1.fc9
> > Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
> > rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
> > Requires: libdstr.so.2
> > Processing files: libdstr-debuginfo-20080124-1.fc9
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > But
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > [tasaka1 at localhost SPECS]$ rpm -qp --requires
> > ../RPMS/i386/libdstr-devel-20080124-1.fc9.i386.rpm
> > libdstr = 20080124-1.fc9
> > libdstr.so.2
> > rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
> > rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > So actually libdstr-devel requires libdstr = %name-%version.
> > Perhaps "rpm" side (and packages "rpm" depends on) changed somewhat?
> > Anyway it seems to be working. (Maybe I have to file a bug against
> > "rpm"??)
>
> looks like that.
Filed as bug 431721 as not only libdstr seems affected.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=398488
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=398489
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list