[Bug 225294] Merge Review: authd

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Feb 13 10:02:50 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: authd


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225294





------- Additional Comments From jsafrane at redhat.com  2008-02-13 05:02 EST -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> rpmlint on srpm:
> 
> authd.src:7: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes pidentd
Fixed

> authd.src:18: W: prereq-use xinetd
Fixed

> authd.src: W: no-url-tag
See below

> authd.i386: E: non-readable /etc/ident.key 0640
That's an intention, it's secret password.

> authd.i386: E: zero-length /etc/ident.key
That's an intention, it's zero-length secret password.

> authd.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/ident.key
That's an intention, do not overwrite the password.
> These are OK.


> authd.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%post chown
> Fix if possible, might want to use the full path to chown.
Chown is needed, and there *is* full path to /bin/chown.

> In addition to needing a URL tag, the Source tag needs a url pointing to the
> upstream tarball.  If Fedora or RH are upstream, get a space on hosted.
I did not find any upstream of authd, did I miss something? If there is not any,
I'll go to fedorahosted.org

> License tag should be GPLv2+.
Fixed

> Error in rawhide mock build:
Fixed

> Other than that, looks good, no other blockers.
Thanks for the review!

After the fixes (authd-1.4.3-14.rpm), rpmlint complains about:
authd.i386: E: non-readable /etc/ident.key 0640
authd.i386: E: zero-length /etc/ident.key
authd.i386: W: no-url-tag
authd.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/ident.key
authd.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%post chown
authd.src: W: no-url-tag
authd-debuginfo.i386: W: no-url-tag

All these errors except url are described above. 

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list