[Bug 432482] Review Request: ocaml-cryptokit - OCaml library of cryptographic and hash functions
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Feb 15 17:53:03 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: ocaml-cryptokit - OCaml library of cryptographic and hash functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432482
------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-15 12:53 EST -------
Thanks for the review. I have changed the license as suggested
and I have "unduplicated" the README %doc file, so now only the
LICENSE file is duplicated in both packages.
Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-cryptokit.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-cryptokit-1.3-2.fc8.src.rpm
This is the diff to the specfile from before:
diff -u -r1.1 ocaml-cryptokit.spec
--- ocaml-cryptokit.spec 12 Feb 2008 11:35:13 -0000 1.1
+++ ocaml-cryptokit.spec 15 Feb 2008 17:50:35 -0000
@@ -3,11 +3,11 @@
Name: ocaml-cryptokit
Version: 1.3
-Release: 1%{?dist}
+Release: 2%{?dist}
Summary: OCaml library of cryptographic and hash functions
Group: Development/Libraries
-License: LGPLv2
+License: LGPLv2 with exceptions
URL: http://pauillac.inria.fr/~xleroy/software.html
Source0: http://caml.inria.fr/distrib/bazar-ocaml/cryptokit-1.3.tar.gz
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@
%files devel
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
-%doc README LICENSE Changes doc
+%doc LICENSE Changes doc
%if %opt
%{_libdir}/ocaml/*.a
%{_libdir}/ocaml/*.cmxa
@@ -109,5 +109,9 @@
%changelog
+* Fri Feb 15 2008 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> - 1.3-2
+- Don't duplicate the README file in both packages.
+- Change the license to LGPLv2 with exceptions.
+
* Tue Feb 12 2008 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> - 1.3-1
- Initial RPM release.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list