[Bug 430417] Review Request: PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont - Lite version of the PersonalCopy General Midi soundfont
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Feb 19 10:46:16 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont - Lite version of the PersonalCopy General Midi soundfont
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430417
------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-02-19 05:46 EST -------
(In reply to comment #15)
> Sure, generally I like design proposed by Hans in comment #12. I like the idea
> of two user groups design, one designed for embedding into other apps and
> another patchset for music composers.
Good.
> I don't like timidity++.cfg creation in %post, where the configuration
> would be dependent on random patchset state in /usr/share/soundfonts/. The new
> soundfonts really should have virtual provides such as soundfont2 as proposed by
> Hans.
OKay,
I agree that generating timidity++.cfg on the fly isn't pretty. An alternative
would be to add virtual provides: soundfont2 to all soundfont packages. But make
timidity++ explicitly Requires PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont, and point to that in
timidity++.cfg.
Advantages:
-no ugly kludges to generate /etc/timidity++.cfg
-a reasonable default, if we trust on virtual provides only, then the default
will become the shortest package
Downsides:
-people who want to use another soundfont, must still have
PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont installed because of the deps, taking up diskspace
I think that given no a days large disks, the downside is survivable and this is
a reasonable compromise. Agreed?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list