[Bug 225723] Merge Review: elfutils

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: elfutils


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225723





------- Additional Comments From roland at redhat.com  2008-02-20 03:22 EST -------
I've committed elfutils.spec updates to devel/ CVS, though there won't be a new
build til the next elfutils release in a week or two.  Please eyeball the spec
changes.

The %doc files don't really have to be copied into each subpackage, do they?
They are in elfutils.

I added versions to the obsoletes for the RHL8.0 version that was obsoleted in
RH8.0.1 by elfutils-libelf.  I added a Provides: libelf-devel to
elfutils-libelf-devel.  libelf is a pure DSO package, so an explicit provide
does not make sense.  (These obsoletes/provides are so old we might just punt
them--we don't support upgrade paths from RHL8 anyway.)

rpmlint is not clever enough to see that elfutils-libelf-devel depends on
elfutils-libelf-%{_arch} because a plain elfutils-libelf dependency is not
really sufficient for biarch machines.

I think I fixed all the cosmetic items.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.