[Bug 232465] Review Request: lv2core - An Audio Plugin Standard

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: lv2core - An Audio Plugin Standard


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232465


tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |tibbs at math.uh.edu




------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2008-01-21 17:46 EST -------
Builds OK; here's some rpmlint output:

  lv2core.x86_64: W: invalid-license LGPL2.1+
Valid tags are at http://fedoraproject.org/Licensing; should be LGPLv2+.

  lv2core.x86_64: E: no-binary
  lv2core.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
  lv2core-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package
Comment #1 mentioned that this package should be noarch; is there some reason
why it needs to be arch-specific?  I can't find any reason why it would.

  lv2core-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
This is OK.

I'm afraid I don't know what a .ttl file is, but just to be sure: can you
confirm that the two ttl files are needed at runtime and not just during
compilation?  I'm trying to determine whether or not they need to live in the
-devel package (which would sort of make the whole thing a -devel package, I guess).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.