[Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot - pplication that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Jan 6 21:22:11 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: themonospot - pplication that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674
wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|Review Request: <main |Review Request: themonospot
|package name here> - <short |- pplication that can be
|summary here> |used to scan an avi file and
| |extract some informations
| |about audio and video data
| |flow
------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-06 16:22 EST -------
Needs lots of work.
Most obvious errors:
- GPL is no longer a valid license tag. See
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/ for details
- Applications/AudioVideo is not one of the standard groups
- your %descriptions lacks a subject for the phrase that is included in the
first paragraph. I also suggest to use "Using themonospot it is also possible to
modify FourCC informations <rest of phrase here>" for the second paragraph.
- the %distribution and %vendor tags should not be included in your spec (see
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines)
- Please use rpm macros instead of absolute paths (i.e. replace "./configure
--prefix=/usr" with "%configure --prefix=%{_prefix}" or even better just with
%configure )
- the desktop file should be installed according to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-254ddf07aae20a23ced8cecc219d8f73926e9755,
not using ln;pixmaps should probably be included in %files
- the .pc file should probably not be included
- the version reported by the most recent entry in the changelog is not
identical to the one of the package (0.6.5 versus 0.6.5-1)
And last but not least, you should provide access to the src.rpm.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list