[Bug 226054] Merge Review: libuser

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: libuser


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226054





------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2008-01-07 16:27 EST -------
As discussed on IRC, there's no upstream for this package.  So the various
rpmlint complaints like:
  libuser.x86_64: W: no-url-tag
are OK.  Following http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL this
needs a comment in the spec, which I'll commit shortly.

This shows up when you run rpmlint on the installed package:
  libuser.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency 
   /usr/lib64/libuser.so.1.1.10 /lib64/libdl.so.2
I don't think it's a big issue but perhaps you know what causes it.  It just
looks like libuser.so is linked against libdl.so but doesn't actually call any
symbols from it.

I've seen the "WITH_SELINUX" stuff in other formerly core packages and I have
to say I'm not quite sure what utility it has these days where everything is
always built with selinux support.

I think the bit at the end of %install really should be in a %check section
instead, but that's not the kind of change I want to commit without consulting
you.

This file in the -devel package looks a bit odd:
  /usr/include/libuser/default.-c
Any idea if that's a typo?

Checklist:
* No upstream source to compare against.
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint has acceptable complaints.
* final provides and requires are sane:


  libuser-0.56.6-4.x86_64.rpm
   config(libuser) = 0.56.6-4
   libuser.so.1()(64bit)
   libuser_files.so()(64bit)
   libuser_ldap.so()(64bit)
   libuser_shadow.so()(64bit)
   libuser = 0.56.6-4
  =
   /sbin/ldconfig
   config(libuser) = 0.56.6-4
   libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
   libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
   libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
   libldap-2.4.so.2()(64bit)
   libpam.so.0()(64bit)
   libpam.so.0(LIBPAM_1.0)(64bit)
   libpam_misc.so.0()(64bit)
   libpam_misc.so.0(LIBPAM_MISC_1.0)(64bit)
   libpopt.so.0()(64bit)
   libpopt.so.0(LIBPOPT_0)(64bit)
   libselinux.so.1()(64bit)
   libuser.so.1()(64bit)
   
  libuser-devel-0.56.6-4.x86_64.rpm
   libuser-devel = 0.56.6-4
  =
   glib2-devel
   libuser = 0.56.6-4
   libuser.so.1()(64bit)
   
  libuser-python-0.56.6-4.x86_64.rpm
   libusermodule.so()(64bit)
   libuser-python = 0.56.6-4
  =
   libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
   libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
   libpam.so.0()(64bit)
   libpam.so.0(LIBPAM_1.0)(64bit)
   libpam_misc.so.0()(64bit)
   libpam_misc.so.0(LIBPAM_MISC_1.0)(64bit)
   libselinux.so.1()(64bit)
   libuser = 0.56.6-4
   libuser.so.1()(64bit)
   python(abi) = 2.5

* ldconfig called properly
* unversioned .so files are in the -devel package.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* scriptlets look OK (ldconfig)
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* headers are in the -devel package and are in a subdirectory to avoid
   conflicts.
* pkgconfig file is in the -devel package.
* no static libraries.
* no libtool .la files.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.