[Bug 428352] New: Review Request: fedora-idm-console:

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Jan 10 23:50:23 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428352

           Summary: Review Request: fedora-idm-console:
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: rmeggins at redhat.com
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: dennis at ausil.us,fedora-package-
                    review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/fedora-idm-console.spec
SRPM URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/fedora-idm-console-1.1.1-1.src.rpm
Description: This provides the Fedora branded console for use with
idm-console-framework for Fedora Directory Server.

Builds in mock, both f-8 i386 and x86_64.

rpmlint says "E: no-binary".  This will require a bit of explanation:

There appears to be a bug in Java.  The default Java java.library.path uses
/usr/lib even on 64bit systems.  This means that if the app uses JNI, it will
not find the 64-bit libs by default.  The argument
-Djava.library.path=%{_libdir} must be passed to the JRE.  This means the
package becomes an arch specific package, even though there are no arch specific
binaries in the package.  This appears to be a bug in Sun Java, IBM Java, and in
IcedTea Java.

So I would like to propose that this particular rpmlint error be waived for the
fedora package review.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list