[Bug 428352] New: Review Request: fedora-idm-console:
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Jan 10 23:50:23 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428352
Summary: Review Request: fedora-idm-console:
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: rmeggins at redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
CC: dennis at ausil.us,fedora-package-
review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com
Spec URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/fedora-idm-console.spec
SRPM URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/fedora-idm-console-1.1.1-1.src.rpm
Description: This provides the Fedora branded console for use with
idm-console-framework for Fedora Directory Server.
Builds in mock, both f-8 i386 and x86_64.
rpmlint says "E: no-binary". This will require a bit of explanation:
There appears to be a bug in Java. The default Java java.library.path uses
/usr/lib even on 64bit systems. This means that if the app uses JNI, it will
not find the 64-bit libs by default. The argument
-Djava.library.path=%{_libdir} must be passed to the JRE. This means the
package becomes an arch specific package, even though there are no arch specific
binaries in the package. This appears to be a bug in Sun Java, IBM Java, and in
IcedTea Java.
So I would like to propose that this particular rpmlint error be waived for the
fedora package review.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list