[Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481


panemade at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |tibbs at math.uh.edu




------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com  2008-01-10 21:04 EST -------
(In reply to comment #19)
> (In reply to comment #18)
> > As per comment 11, I strongly recommend creating a separate package for
> > docbook-xsl and making this review depend on it so as not to further delay
> > this review.
> 
> This package is dependent on this exact version of the xsl and is smaller than
> many source packages currently in Fedora. 
> 
> see:
> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/source/SRPMS/
> 
> > It may be worth raising the naming issue on fedora-packaging list.
> 
> I think that whole discussion is ridiculous, pointless and a complete waste of
> time. I'll see if I can convince the manager in question to reconsider this push.
> 
  I don't think so. If people will start thinking and implementing their own
packaging guidelines then we don't need any policies/committees to discuss any
issues in fedora. Saying so I think question has been raised on fedora's work,
its policies.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.