[Bug 225793] Merge Review: gftp

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Jan 13 14:53:18 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: gftp


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225793


bugzilla at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |medium
           Priority|normal                      |medium
            Product|Fedora Extras               |Fedora
            Version|devel                       |rawhide

tyler.l.owen at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |tyler.l.owen at gmail.com
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




------- Additional Comments From tyler.l.owen at gmail.com  2008-01-13 09:53 EST -------
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
FIX - Spec has consistant macro usage.
        Don't use %makeinstall macro
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License
OK - License field in spec matches
OK - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
44b19442d06f6dc68c7211d66029d826  gftp-2.0.18.tar.bz2
44b19442d06f6dc68c7211d66029d826  gftp-2.0.18.tar.bz2.1

OK - BuildRequires correct
OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Package has correct buildroot
      %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
OK - Package is code or permissible content.

OK - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file
        should change vendor to fedora

OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
FIX - No rpmlint output.
        see issue #1

SHOULD Items:

OK - Should build in mock.
OK - Should build on all supported archs
OK - Should function as described.
OK - Should have sane scriptlets.
OK - Should have dist tag
OK - Should package latest version

Issues:

1. SRPM: 
        gftp.src: E: non-utf8-spec-file
/tmp/gftp-2.0.18-1.fc9.src.rpm.7432/gftp.spec
        - The character encoding of the spec file is not UTF-8.  Convert it for
          example using iconv(1).

        gftp.src:142: W: macro-in-%changelog prefix
         - in changelog entries use %% instead of %

        gftp.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 55, tab: line 57)
        - Fix if you like

        gftp.src: E: tag-not-utf8 %changelog
        - The character encoding of the value of this tag is not UTF-8.


   RPM:
        gftp.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1:2.0.18-1 2:2.0.18-1.fc9
        - The last entry in %changelog contains a version identifier that is not
          coherent with the epoch:version-release tuple of the package. 
        - Since this package has the history it does it is not possible to fix this

        gftp.i386: E: tag-not-utf8 %changelog
        - The character encoding of the value of this tag is not UTF-8.

2. Do not use %makeinstall macro


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list