[Bug 232465] Review Request: lv2core - An Audio Plugin Standard

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: lv2core - An Audio Plugin Standard


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232465





------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com  2008-01-21 18:35 EST -------
(In reply to comment #8)
> Builds OK; here's some rpmlint output:
> 
>   lv2core.x86_64: W: invalid-license LGPL2.1+
> Valid tags are at http://fedoraproject.org/Licensing; should be LGPLv2+.

Ok.

> 
>   lv2core.x86_64: E: no-binary
>   lv2core.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
>   lv2core-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package
> Comment #1 mentioned that this package should be noarch; is there some reason
> why it needs to be arch-specific?  I can't find any reason why it would.

It's conceivable that the .pc file could be different for different architectures.

>   lv2core-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
> This is OK.
> 
> I'm afraid I don't know what a .ttl file is, but just to be sure: can you
> confirm that the two ttl files are needed at runtime and not just during
> compilation?  I'm trying to determine whether or not they need to live in the
> -devel package (which would sort of make the whole thing a -devel package, I
guess).

They are used at runtime by lv2 hosts.



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.