[Bug 378841] Review Request: python-rdflib - Python library for working with RDF

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Jan 22 22:25:06 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request:  python-rdflib - Python library for working with RDF


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=378841





------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com  2008-01-22 17:25 EST -------
You're right, only the doctests seem to fail.
Most of them seem rather buggy, for example:

[ruben at odin rdflib-2.4.0]$ nosetests rdflib/util.py
nose.config: INFO: Excluding tests matching ['(.*(store|mysql).*)']
Doctest: rdflib.util.date_time ... FAIL
Doctest: rdflib.util.parse_date_time ... ok

===============================================================
=======
FAIL: Doctest: rdflib.util.date_time
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/doctest.py", line 2112, in runTest
    raise self.failureException(self.format_failure(new.getvalue()))
AssertionError: Failed doctest test for rdflib.util.date_time
  File "/home/ruben/rpmbuild/BUILD/rdflib-2.4.0/rdflib/util.py", line 58, in date_time

----------------------------------------------------------------------
File "/home/ruben/rpmbuild/BUILD/rdflib-2.4.0/rdflib/util.py", line 64, in rdflib.util.date_time
Failed example:
    date_time(1126482850, local_time_zone=True)
Expected:
    '2005-09-11T19:54:10-04:00'
Got:
    '2005-09-12T01:54:10--2:00'


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 2 tests in 0.064s

FAILED (failures=1)

That test depends on my local timezone.

So I think leaving them out is ok.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list