[Bug 429028] Review Request: upstart - an event-driven init daemon
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Jan 31 20:08:46 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: upstart - an event-driven init daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429028
notting at redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |notting at redhat.com
------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2008-01-31 15:08 EST -------
MUST:
- Package meets naming guidelines - OK
- Spec file matches base package name. - OK
- Spec has consistant macro usage. - ***
- Meets Packaging Guidelines. - OK
- License - GPLv2+ - OK
- License field in spec matches - OK
- License file included in package - ***
- Spec in American English - OK
- Spec is legible. - OK
- Sources match upstream md5sum:
794208083d405ece123ad59a02f3e233 - OK
- Package needs ExcludeArch - N/A
- BuildRequires correct - OK
- Spec handles locales/find_lang - OK
- Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. - OK
- Package has a correct %clean section. - OK
- Package has correct buildroot - OK
- Package is code or permissible content. - OK
- Doc subpackage needed/used. - N/A
- Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. - OK, once they're added
- Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. - N/A, nuked
- Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun - OK
- .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig - N/A
- .la files are removed. - OK
- Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. - once issue #1 addressed,
yes (tested x86_64)
- Package has no duplicate files in %files. - OK
- Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. - OK
- Package owns all the directories it creates. - OK
- No rpmlint output.
upstart.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/event.d/logd
This may be OK, if this isn't meant to be user modified.
- final provides and requires are sane: ***
SHOULD Items:
- Should build in mock. - OK (tested x86_64)
- Should build on all supported archs - didn't test ppc
- Should function as described. - ***
- Should have sane scriptlets. - N/A
- Should have dist tag - OK
- Should package latest version - OK
Issues:
1) %configure --enable-compat=sysv --sbindir=/sbin --libdir=/lib
Needs to be --libdir=/%{_lib}, otherwise build will fail on x86_64, ppc64.
2) No docs, including licenses
Probably should include ChangeLog, AUTHORS, COPYING, NEWS, README, TODO, HACKING
3) Should this package require event-compat-sysv? Should it obsolete/provide
sysvinit?
4) Re: functionality. I think that will go in a separate bug.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list