[Bug 453567] Review Request: libfonts - Java TrueType Font Layouting

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libfonts - Java TrueType Font Layouting


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453567


tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |tibbs at math.uh.edu
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2008-07-02 16:43 EST -------
Builds fine for me; rpmlint only has the usual bogus complaint about the Group:.
 The URL continues to not provide any information about this package, but google
doesn't turn up a better URL to use.  I can't even find a download link.  Is it
possible to use a reasonable URL for this package?  Maybe just use
http://sourceforge.net/projects/jfreereport/, which I found from searching
around on sourceforge and which actually has libfonts in the download section.

The current release seems to be 0.4.0, out May 30.  Any reason not to use it?

Here's my checklist for the 0.3.4 version:
* source files match upstream:
   7c8616aee3b8affc38d96e6cdf96fc49bd4a3834c1452abb189609fbce1f0ea8
   libfonts-0.3.4.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint has acceptable complaints.
* final provides and requires are sane:
  libfonts-0.3.4-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm
   libfonts.jar.so()(64bit)
   libfonts = 0.3.4-1.fc10
  =
   /bin/sh
   java
   java-gcj-compat >= 1.0.31
   jcommon
   jpackage-utils
   libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
   libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
   libgcj_bc.so.1()(64bit)
   libloader >= 0.3.7-1
   libz.so.1()(64bit)

  libfonts-javadoc-0.3.4-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm
   libfonts-javadoc = 0.3.4-1.fc10
  =
   jpackage-utils
   libfonts = 0.3.4-1.fc10

* %check is not present; no test suite upstream.
* no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* scriptlets OK 
* code, not content.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no pre-built jars
* single jar, named after the package
* jarfiles are under _javadir.
* javadocs are under _javadocdir.
* ant called properly.
* gcj called properly.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.