[Bug 452911] Review Request: trustyrc - IRC robot fully modular
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Jul 2 22:16:10 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: trustyrc - IRC robot fully modular
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452911
tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flag| |fedora-review+
------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-07-02 18:16 EST -------
I note you didn't update the summary. I'm not going to block this package because of language issues, but I would really suggest using something like the following, which I have written using your original text and applying as few changes as I could in order to make the result parse in English:
Summary: Fully modular IRC robot
%description
trustyRC is a fully modular IRC robot which includes all of the common bot features (channel moderation, administration, account system, quotes) and much more. trustyRC is comprised of a a kernel and a plugin loader which loads features such as a log system, configuration parser, networking, etc. All plugins can communicate with others, providing a highly flexible system.
A plugin can be loaded or unloaded while the bot is running, so if a plugin needs to be updated, it can be unloaded, rebuilt and reloaded. During this, the bot does not need to be stopped. Plugins are stored in shared libraries; a plugin's features are available to the bot when the plugin is loaded and those features are removed when the plugin is unloaded.
* source files match upstream:
3a499e5a9303f77e5e6b5fdb93abaefe8d4a906476d0e1eabb1a1241a644b502
trustyrc-0.1.1.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
? summary is difficult to understand in English.
? description is very difficult to parse in English.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint has acceptable complaints.
* final provides and requires are sane:
trustyrc-0.1.1-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm
config(trustyrc) = 0.1.1-2.fc10
trustyrc = 0.1.1-2.fc10
=
config(trustyrc) = 0.1.1-2.fc10
libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.9)(64bit)
libtinyxml.so.0()(64bit)
trustyrc-plugins
trustyrc-plugins-0.1.1-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm
admin.so()(64bit)
ctcp.so()(64bit)
ignore.so()(64bit)
infos.so()(64bit)
moderation.so()(64bit)
module.so()(64bit)
ping.so()(64bit)
postconnect.so()(64bit)
usersinfos.so()(64bit)
trustyrc-plugins = 0.1.1-2.fc10
=
libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit)
trustyrc = 0.1.1
trustyrc-plugins-extras-0.1.1-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm
advertising.so()(64bit)
bashfr.so()(64bit)
bzrh.so()(64bit)
fedorafr.so()(64bit)
fedoraproject.so()(64bit)
gameserver.so()(64bit)
ipconverting.so()(64bit)
lamoule.so()(64bit)
magic8ball.so()(64bit)
pluginsample.so()(64bit)
quotes.so()(64bit)
slapme.so()(64bit)
survey.so()(64bit)
tele.so()(64bit)
trad.so()(64bit)
trustyrc-plugins-extras = 0.1.1-2.fc10
=
libcurl.so.4()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit)
trustyrc = 0.1.1
* %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I've no idea how to test this
package.
* no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no static libraries.
* no libtool .la files.
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list