[Bug 226363] Merge Review: redhat-lsb

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: redhat-lsb


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226363





------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com  2008-07-04 03:42 EST -------
(In reply to comment #24)
> 1. Yes, after reconfirmation with llim, it's GPLv2.

I think you need to go through the source files and audit more carefully.
Some are clearly GPLv2+ and a few LGPL.

> 2. I don't think it's redhat-lsb requiring its own files, redhat-lsb and lsb are
> 2 different packages. For example, redhat-lsb may delegate the database querying
> job to lsb to find out the dependencies.

% repoquery -q --whatprovides /usr/lib/lsb/install_initd
redhat-lsb-0:3.1-19.fc8.i386
% repoquery -q --whatprovides /usr/lib/lsb/remove_initd
redhat-lsb-0:3.1-19.fc8.i386
% rpm -qlp redhat-lsb-3.1-19.fc8.i386.rpm| grep _initd
/usr/lib/lsb/install_initd
/usr/lib/lsb/remove_initd

> 3. I'd like to know why the path is intentionally hard-coded. 

Because the directory name should be lib and not lib64 even on 64bit machines I
guess.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.