[Bug 245561] Review Request: ht - File editor/viewer/analyzer for executables

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Jul 4 22:52:19 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ht - File editor/viewer/analyzer for executables


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245561





------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name  2008-07-04 18:52 EST -------
I changed the version in the spec to 2.0.13 and the rpm built fine. Here is my
review:

- rpmlint: good enough: 
ht.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/ht-2.0.13/TODO
This should probably be reported to upstream because file says:
$ file TODO
TODO: Non-ISO extended-ASCII English text
- naming: ok
- license: ok, GPLv2, included
- builds on koji for dist-f10: ok
- no libraries / subpackages: ok
- not a gui tool, no .desktop needed: ok
- %install: ok
- %clean: ok
- Honoring %optflags: NOT OK:
build.log shows usage of -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer and the Fedora optflags are
not used
- BuildRequires: NOT OK:
It should BR: lzo-devel, because otherwise it uses a local copy of minilzo
instead of the Fedora lzo library

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list