[Bug 434861] Review Request: python-tftpy - Python TFTP library
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Jul 5 15:42:59 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: python-tftpy - Python TFTP library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434861
rakesh.pandit at gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rakesh.pandit at gmail.com
------- Additional Comments From rakesh.pandit at gmail.com 2008-07-05 11:42 EST -------
I am not sponsored yet. So, cannot officially review your package. But to help
here is an:
Unofficial package review
===============
rpmlint -i <srpm>:
python-tftpy.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 4)
python-tftpy.src: E: description-line-too-long Tftpy is a TFTP library for the
Python programming language. It includes client and server classes, with sample
implementations. Hooks are included for
python-tftpy.src: E: description-line-too-long easy inclusion in a UI for
populating progress indicators. It supports RFCs 1350, 2347 and 2348.
rpmlint -i <rpm>
python-tftpy.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python-
tftpy-0.4.5/bin/tftpy_server.py
python-tftpy.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-tftpy-0.4.5/
bin/tftpy_server.py /usr/bin/env
- You seem to have mixed tabs and spaces
- Try wrapping description to 80 columns (1 column = 1 char) a line
- bin files -- 'bin/tftpy_client.py' & 'bin/tftpy_server.py' should go to 'doc'
but they should go to 'bin'
you are excluding .pyc and .pyo but files are not there.
- you need to replace env in these files with %{__python} -- may be consult
reviewer
Required
=====
[x] Package naming & spec file naming
[x] md5sum matches for source from srpm and project page
[?] License field present, but file COPYING does not look license to me --
It says 'if you press accept' so essentially it is being used while using
this program.
It looks okay to me - but may be do some more research.
[x] spec file is legible and written in American English
[x] All files are in utf-8
[x] no static libraries, no libtool, package does not own files or folders used
by other packages.
[x] nothing used in %doc for runtime.
[x] consistently used macros
[x] package build and compile using koji
[-] tabs and spaces mixed
[-] dependency env warning
[-] description is okay but needs to be wrapped.
Optional
=====
[x] latest stable packaged
[?] includes a COPYING file but needs some more research
-N/A, x = check, ! = Problem and ? = Not evaluated
It is okay, just needs some quick fixs in my few.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list