[Bug 452523] Review Request: perl-Event-ExecFlow - High level API for event-based execution flow control

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Jul 11 22:50:30 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-Event-ExecFlow - High level API for event-based execution flow control


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452523





------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org  2008-07-11 18:50 EST -------
+ source files match upstream : 79116732b550701a3436a448581e01da
+ package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.

- license field matches the actual license :
The README file says same license as perl, thus GPL+ or Artistic, but most files
say LGPLv2+

+ license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream.
+ latest version is being packaged.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ compiler flags are appropriate.
+ %clean is present.
+ package builds in mock ( ).
+ package installs properly
- rpmlint is silent :
perl-Event-ExecFlow.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/execflow 0555
perl-Event-ExecFlow.noarch: W: file-not-utf8
/usr/share/doc/perl-Event-ExecFlow-0.63/README

- final provides and requires are sane:
This provide is dubious :
perl(AnyEvent::Impl::Event::Glib)

+ %check is present and all tests pass
+ owns the directories it creates.

- doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
The directories below are installed and owned :
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/Event
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/Event/ExecFlow

+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ no scriptlets present.
+ code, not content.
+ documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
+ %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list