[Bug 457152] Review Request: appliance-tools tools for generating appliance images on Fedora

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Jul 29 22:22:18 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: appliance-tools tools for generating appliance images on Fedora


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457152





------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com  2008-07-29 18:22 EST -------
  OK - Package name
  N/A - License info is accurate

  Upstream does not include a separate license, though comments in the code
  indicate GPLv2 (would be good if upstream included a license; in that
  case, install it as %doc)

  OK - License tag is correct and licenses are approved
  N/A - License files are installed as %doc
  OK - Specfile name
  OK - Specfile is legible
  OK - No prebuilt binaries included
  OK - BuildRoot value (one of the recommended values)
  OK - PreReq not used
  N/A - Source md5sum matches upstream

  Upstream has not made an official release; it would be good if that
  happened. Barring that, there needs to be a comment before Source0
  explaining how the tarball was generated

  OK - No hardcoded pathnames
  OK - Package owns all the files it installs
  OK - 'Requires' create needed unowned directories
  OK - Package builds successfully on i386 and x86_64 (mock)
  OK - BuildRequires sufficient
  OK - File permissions set properly
  OK - Macro usage is consistent
  OK - rpmlint is silent

  OK - definition of python_sitelib
  OK - Generate and include *.py[co] in sitelib
  OK - Do not include *.py[oc] in /usr/{bin,sbin}


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list