[Bug 451120] Review Request: lua-lpeg - Parsing Expression Grammars for Lua

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Jun 12 23:49:12 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: lua-lpeg - Parsing Expression Grammars for Lua


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451120





------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2008-06-12 19:49 EST -------
Builds fine and rpmlint is silent.  I see two issues, one minor and one major.

The minor one: the sed and chmod at the end of %install seem to me to make more
sense in %prep.

The major one: You need to be consistent about using macros like %{__cc}; you
need to use %{__rm}, %{__mkdir}, %{__chmod} and %{__sed} instead.  Or just use
the non-macro forms everywhere.

* source files match upstream:
   8859c3dbd1d3dfd21c422362a66ad7c3c2c840fbbd47c7b806a5ba0c0013514a  
   lpeg-0.8.1.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named and is cleanly written.
X specfile does not use macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   lpeg.so.0.8.1()(64bit)
   lua-lpeg = 0.8.1-1.fc10
  =
   lua >= 5.1

* %check is present and all tests pass.
* no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no static libraries.
* no libtool .la files.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list