[Bug 450466] Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Jun 24 20:42:44 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450466
------- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat.com 2008-06-24 16:42 EST -------
> %define major_version 0.4
> %define minor_version 16
> Version: %{major_version}.%{minor_version}
I don't think it's necessary to have it because of one edit less in Source0
line. But never mind.
Looking at random py src file, the license is actually GNU GPLv2+, please, fix
the License line in spec.
Looking at the Requires line from rpmbuild
Requires: /usr/bin/env newt-python python >= 2.4 python(abi) = 2.5
python-feedparser python-urlgrabber xclip
I see that you don't need 'python >= 2.4' because RPM-dep-solver said
'python(abi) = 2.5', feel free to omit it.
> make %{?_smp_mflags}
Useless in Python code. Feel free to echo the variable. It contains just '-j2'
or similar. Useful only while compiling C(++) code.
Once you are using '%{__sed}' and then 'rm -rf ...' -- be consistent.
> %{__sed} -i -e
s@"\${exec_prefix}/lib/python2.5/site-packages"@$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{python_sitelib}@
Makefile
> %{__sed} -i -e
s@"\${prefix}/lib/python2.5/site-packages"@$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{python_sitelib}@
Makefile
Is it really necessary in newer clive version? What happen if the 2 lines are
missing?
%{_mandir}/man?/%{name}*
is more general when it comes to change of the X in clive.X.man file.
--
Hope to help.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list