[Bug 450466] Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Jun 24 20:42:44 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450466





------- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat.com  2008-06-24 16:42 EST -------
> %define major_version 0.4
> %define minor_version 16
> Version:        %{major_version}.%{minor_version}

I don't think it's necessary to have it because of one edit less in Source0
line. But never mind.



Looking at random py src file, the license is actually GNU GPLv2+, please, fix
the License line in spec.



Looking at the Requires line from rpmbuild 

    Requires: /usr/bin/env newt-python python >= 2.4 python(abi) = 2.5
python-feedparser python-urlgrabber xclip


I see that you don't need 'python >= 2.4' because RPM-dep-solver said
'python(abi) = 2.5', feel free to omit it.


> make %{?_smp_mflags}

Useless in Python code. Feel free to echo the variable. It contains just '-j2'
or similar. Useful only while compiling C(++) code.



Once you are using '%{__sed}' and then 'rm -rf ...' -- be consistent.



> %{__sed} -i -e
s@"\${exec_prefix}/lib/python2.5/site-packages"@$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{python_sitelib}@
Makefile
> %{__sed} -i -e
s@"\${prefix}/lib/python2.5/site-packages"@$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{python_sitelib}@
Makefile


Is it really necessary in newer clive version? What happen if the 2 lines are
missing?



%{_mandir}/man?/%{name}*

is more general when it comes to change of the X in clive.X.man file.
--

Hope to help. 

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list