[Bug 453026] Review Request: xmp - A multi-format module player
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Jun 26 20:52:11 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xmp - A multi-format module player
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453026
cra at wpi.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |cra at wpi.edu
------- Additional Comments From cra at wpi.edu 2008-06-26 16:52 EST -------
On naming, it looks like most audacious plugin packages are named
audacious-plugins-*. The only exception is audacious-plugin-fc. The "plugins"
packages appear to be all built from a single audacious-plugins src.rpm, so it
makes sense to use "plugins" for that. The fc plugin is a single plugin built
from its own audacious-plugin-fc.src.rpm package.
audacious.i386 1.4.6-1.fc9 installed
audacious-libs.i386 1.4.6-1.fc9 installed
audacious-plugin-fc.i386 0.2-6 installed
audacious-plugins.i386 1.4.5-1.fc9 installed
audacious-plugins-amidi.i386 1.4.5-1.fc9 installed
audacious-plugins-vortex.i386 1.4.5-1.fc9 installed
audacious-plugins-wavpack.i386 1.4.5-1.fc9 installed
Available Packages
audacious-devel.i386 1.4.6-1.fc9 fedora
audacious-plugins-arts.i386 1.4.5-1.fc9 fedora
audacious-plugins-esd.i386 1.4.5-1.fc9 fedora
audacious-plugins-jack.i386 1.4.5-1.fc9 fedora
audacious-plugins-metronome.i386 1.4.5-1.fc9 fedora
Thoughts? "audacious-plugin-xmp" is consistent with the fc plugin, so I'm okay
with that naming.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list