[Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2008-03-01 04:09 EST -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> The current status of stuff (or what I would say is most important) is that a 
> large portion of the BRs don't exist yet in Fedora (due to the nascent Java 
> packaging guidelines) or are hugely outdated. So I predict this package won't 
> get in for quite a while because of this.
> 
> But here's the shopping list:
> 
> * asm 3.0 (we currently have asm2, which is 2.1)
> * emma (we don't have this at all yet)
> * jarjar (we don't have this either)
> * jline (we have 0.9.9, upstream is 0.9.94)
> * jna (we don't have it at all)
> * joda-time (we don't have it at all)
> * joni (we don't have this, but I probably can/will package it)
> * junit (we have this one! phew!)
> * retroweaver (we don't have this at all either)
> 
> So a lot of this stuff needs to enter Fedora before jruby can. I hope that we 
> can get this stuff in and then jruby by F10. Maybe that is a lofty goal :).

Thank you for investigating BR. This list is very useful
for getting jruby into Fedora.

Then would you also write:
- this BR is already in Fedora
- Someone has already submitted a review request for this BR
- Or even no review request has been submitted for this BR
if you know?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.