[Bug 429221] Review Request: dzcomm - Dzcomm a RS-232 API/lib

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat May 3 09:58:40 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: dzcomm - Dzcomm a RS-232 API/lib


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429221


j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl




------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl  2008-05-03 05:58 EST -------
Hi Ian,

Short intro: I'm a long time Fedora contributer and a sponsor. I haven't been
sponsoring anyone in a while as I've been rather busy with other stuff. But
getting new people into Fedora is important so I've decided to make some time
for sponsering again. As such I would like to sponsor you. The first step here
would be to finish up the packaging of dzcomm and scantool_net so that they are
in a state where they can be approved. The next step then is for you to either
package one or two more packages, for example from these lists:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WishList
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Games/WishList

Or you can do some reviews of other people packages, when you do this please add
a note that it is not an official review as you aren't a contributer yet.

The purpose here is for you to show a good understanding of the packaging
guidelines. Once you've done a couple of good reviews and / or submitted one or
two more good packages, then you can apply for cvsextras membership in the
account system and I'll sponsor you.

---

For starters I would like to give you a hand with fixing some of the issues with
this package (dzcomm), as you're running into some issues which can be somewhat
hard to fix for someone new to packaging, and on top of that this package should
really be building a shared library not a static library as static libraries are
evil, which will require some further patching of the Makefiles.

However before I start spending time on this I would first like to get a firm
commitment from your side, are you willing to make time for this to make this
work, if there will be a silence of 2 weeks between comments all the time, then
this is not going to work.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list