[Bug 459874] Review Request: zeromq - Fast messaging system
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Nov 7 03:08:28 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459874
--- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2008-11-06 22:08:27 EDT ---
I note that 0.3.2 isn't announced upstream, just 0.3.1. 0.3.3 seems to be
tagged as well but I didn't see a tarball.
The descriptions really need some elaboration. "Development files for C", for
example, is almost completely nondescriptive, and "Fast messaging system",
while fine for a summary, really needs elaboration because it could refer just
as well to mutt or an IRC client. Unfortunately the upstream web site is
completely useless as a source of descriptive text. Maybe:
ZeroMQ (0MQ) is an implementation of the Advanced Message Queuing Protocol
(AMQP) written in C++, calling itself "the fastest messaging system ever”.
And then something like:
ZeroMQ C interface libaries.
or something for the C subpackage and
Development files for the ZeroMQ C interface libraries.
Is there any reason the python and java interfaces aren't built? And if the
python interface isn't being built, why is there a build dependency on
python-devel?
Maybe I'm missing something, but zeromq-c-devel doesn't seem to have any
dependency on zeromq-devel, which leaves /usr/include/zmq unowned if
zeromq-c-devel only is installed.
Do you know if the tests under the perf directory are runnable at build time?
It seems like there are some local tests, but I have no idea how to run them.
* source files match upstream:
d11291730967f91762bfdbf7352871ba20fddffe8eead1a66e96cd1053f47eab
zmq-0.3.2.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
X summaries could use some work.
X descriptions could use some work.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
? not sure about BuildRequires: python-devel.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* debuginfo package looks complete.
X rpmlint has some easily fixed complaints.
X final provides and requires:
zeromq-0.3.2-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm
libzmq.so.0()(64bit)
zeromq = 0.3.2-1.fc10
zeromq(x86-64) = 0.3.2-1.fc10
=
/sbin/ldconfig
libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit)
libzmq.so.0()(64bit)
zeromq-c-0.3.2-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm
libczmq.so.0()(64bit)
zeromq-c = 0.3.2-1.fc10
zeromq-c(x86-64) = 0.3.2-1.fc10
=
/sbin/ldconfig
libczmq.so.0()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit)
libzmq.so.0()(64bit)
zeromq = 0.3.2-1.fc10
X no dependency on zeromq-devel
zeromq-c-devel-0.3.2-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm
zeromq-c-devel = 0.3.2-1.fc10
zeromq-c-devel(x86-64) = 0.3.2-1.fc10
=
libczmq.so.0()(64bit)
zeromq-c = 0.3.2-1.fc10
zeromq-devel-0.3.2-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm
zeromq-devel = 0.3.2-1.fc10
zeromq-devel(x86-64) = 0.3.2-1.fc10
=
libzmq.so.0()(64bit)
zeromq = 0.3.2-1.fc10
? not sure if there's a test suite there or not.
* shared libraries installed:
ldconfig is called where necessary
unversioned .so files are present in the respective -devel packages.
X /usr/include/zmq ownership issues in zeromq-c-devel.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no generically named files
* scriptlets are OK (ldconfig)
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* headers are in the -devel packages.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no static libraries.
* no libtool .la files.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list