[Bug 454441] Review Request: R-bigmemory - Manage massive matrices in R using C++, with support for shared memory
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Nov 7 18:25:24 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454441
Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu
Flag| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2008-11-07 13:25:23 EDT ---
I'm a little surprised to see %{__rm} in one of your specs; I don't recall that
you used those in the past. If you do intend them, you probably want
%{__mkdir_p} and %{__cp} as well. Or is there some specific reason that
%{__rm} is being used?
* source files match upstream:
c3ae302a5dc3806f49d59da0ef528e2ea9ead43367a02efd5f39de202709c262
bigmemory_2.3.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
X specfile does not use macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text not included upstream.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint has only the expected R complaints.
* final provides and requires are sane:
bigmemory.so()(64bit)
R-bigmemory = 2.3-1.fc10
R-bigmemory(x86-64) = 2.3-1.fc10
=
/bin/sh
R
libR.so()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.9)(64bit)
texlive-latex
* %check is present and all tests pass.
* no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no generically named files
* scriptlets are OK (R package registration).
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no static libraries.
* no libtool .la files.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list