[Bug 469273] Review Request: quickfix - development library for FIX based applications

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Nov 10 18:36:32 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469273


Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




--- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>  2008-11-10 13:36:30 EDT ---
For -5:

(In reply to comment #11)
> For 1.12.4-3:
> * Compiler flags
>   - Fedora uses "-O2" compiler flags (, which can be checked by
>     $ rpm --eval %optflags ), which is replaced by the latter "-O0",
>     which needs fixing.

  - This issue is not yet fixed. This can be fixed by
------------------------------------------------
%prep
%setup -q -n quickfix
%patch0 -p1
%patch1 -p1
sed -i.flags -e 's|-O0 -g||' src/C++/test/Makefile.in

%build
%configure --enable-shared
......
------------------------------------------------

* Requires
  - Now "BuildRequires: boost-devel" is added, HAVE_BOOST_FAST_POOL_ALLOCATOR
    is defined on config.h and this affects installed config.h
    (however see below: usually config.h must not be installed)
    So now quickfix-devel should have "Requires: boost-devel", too

* Excluding .la files
  - I prefer to use
------------------------------------------------
rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/*.la
------------------------------------------------
    instead of using %exclude in this case.
  - Anyway if you use %exclude, please write this line
    after %defattr(-,root,root,-) line
    (otherwise rpmlint complains)

* autotool generated header files inclusion
  - -devel subpackage installs autotool generated "config.h"
    as a header file.
    This must be avoid, because shipping "config.h" will easily cause
    namespace conflict when compiling codes with quickfix-devel:
    c.f.
    bug 208034 comment 43

    A quick workaround can be:
    - rename installed "config.h" to "quickfix-config.h"
    - and the line #include "config.h" in installed Utility.h 
      to "#include "quickfix-config.h"".

Then:

-------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: Before being sponsored:

This package will be accepted with another few work. 
But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) 
must sponsor you.

Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other 
submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. 
For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) 
are required to "show that you have an understanding 
of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described
on :
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored

Usually there are two ways to show this.
A. submit other review requests with enough quality.
B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request
   (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do
   a formal review)

When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other 
person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report 
so that I can check your comments or review request.

Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to
review can be checked on:
http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html
(NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review")


Review guidelines are described mainly on:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets
------------------------------------------------------------

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list