[Bug 468287] Review Request: cim-schema - Common Information Model (CIM) Schema

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468287





--- Comment #10 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com>  2008-11-19 17:43:44 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Documented: The DMTF Technical Committee chair sent an email to members of the
> TC stating the Board's decision, and asking them to make this change in all
> future published documentation and specifications.  I would expect to see this
> change in a future posting of the CIM Schemas tarball.

A copy of that email would suffice for content (not code) distributed under
that license.

> As for the MOFs (which implement a form of the specification) as code vs
> content, I have asked that the MOFs themselves be licensed under an explicit
> license such as the BSD 3-clause that permits modification.  There is a "MOF
> Compiler".  I am awaiting the answer to this.

>From the context of this, I will assume the bits in the cim-schema packages are
considered code.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.