[Bug 468539] Review Request: sugar-jukebox - Media player activity for Sugar
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Nov 21 13:31:49 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468539
Bryan Kearney <bkearney at redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bkearney at redhat.com
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bkearney at redhat.com
Flag| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #7 from Bryan Kearney <bkearney at redhat.com> 2008-11-21 08:31:47 EDT ---
OK - Package name
OK - License info is accurate
OK - License tag is correct and licenses are approved
OK - License files are installed as %doc
OK - Specfile name
OK - Specfile is legible
OK - No prebuilt binaries included
OK - BuildRoot value (one of the recommended values)
OK - PreReq not used
XX - Source md5sum matches upstream
These do not match, and upstream is "hidden". Please
change to a checkout from source repo.
OK - No hardcoded pathnames
OK - Package owns all the files it installs
OK - 'Requires' create needed unowned directories
OK - Package builds successfully on i386 and x86_64 (mock)
OK - BuildRequires sufficient
OK - File permissions set properly
OK - Macro usage is consistent
OK - rpmlint is silent
Warnings are OK
I have not installed it onto a blank sugar install yet, but have you verified
all the imports are in the Requires?
Please resolve the source code and I will re-review.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list