[Bug 468539] Review Request: sugar-jukebox - Media player activity for Sugar

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Nov 21 13:31:49 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468539


Bryan Kearney <bkearney at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |bkearney at redhat.com
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |bkearney at redhat.com
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




--- Comment #7 from Bryan Kearney <bkearney at redhat.com>  2008-11-21 08:31:47 EDT ---
  OK - Package name
  OK - License info is accurate
  OK - License tag is correct and licenses are approved
  OK - License files are installed as %doc
  OK - Specfile name
  OK - Specfile is legible
  OK - No prebuilt binaries included
  OK - BuildRoot value (one of the recommended values)
  OK - PreReq not used
  XX - Source md5sum matches upstream

 These do not match, and upstream is "hidden". Please
 change to a checkout from source repo.

  OK - No hardcoded pathnames
  OK - Package owns all the files it installs
  OK - 'Requires' create needed unowned directories
  OK - Package builds successfully on i386 and x86_64 (mock)
  OK - BuildRequires sufficient
  OK - File permissions set properly
  OK - Macro usage is consistent
  OK - rpmlint is silent
 Warnings are OK


I have not installed it onto a blank sugar install yet, but have you verified
all the imports are in the Requires?
Please resolve the source code and I will re-review.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list