[Bug 461077] Review Request: nxtvepg - A nexTView EPG decoder and browser

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Nov 25 16:42:07 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461077





--- Comment #24 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>  2008-11-25 11:42:05 EDT ---
This is the case in which GPLv2 part of the codes does not depend on 
GPLv3 part (i.e. GPLv2 part binaries can be rebuilt even if the codes licensed
under GPLv3 are completely removed from the tarball and GPLv2
binaries does not use GPLv3 binaries in essence).

So the question is how this perl script is tied to nxtvepg binary.
- If this perl script can be used without nxtvepg binary (i.e. with this
  binary removed), then multiple licensing situation can be applied.
- If this perl script essencially uses nxtvepg binary, then license
  needs fixing.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list