[Bug 464432] Review Request: octopus - a TDDFT code

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464432





--- Comment #10 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <rpm at greysector.net>  2008-10-02 06:47:14 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Is there an automatic tool to check the licenses of the source files?

I'm using licensecheck.pl from debian-utils. Perhaps it could be added to
fedora-rpmdevtools.

> > - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
> > license.
> > 
> > License: GPLv2+
> > Should be GPLv3+. IIUC LGPLv3+ libraries can only be linked in if GPLv2+
> > sources are "upgraded" to GPLv3. I'll re-check this, but I think I'm correct.
> 
> OK. Funny, I based my SPEC on the SRPM available from the Octopus website.
> You'd think the developers had their licenses right..

See comment #8.

> > SRPM source file doesn't match upstream:
> > 54e00d2eb2af7fbd902876bef32b409e  octopus-3.0.1.tar.gz
> > e17887506f2596e1826d2d09bc75214f  octopus-3.0.1.tar.gz.srpm
> 
> Used the one from upstream SRPM. My bad.

Maybe ask upstream why they are different?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.