[Bug 466777] Review Request: perl-Satcon - Framework for configuration files

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Oct 23 03:29:21 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466777





--- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu>  2008-10-22 23:29:20 EDT ---
The specfile seems to still be 1.4, but I can pull it from the srpm.

Is 1.6 an actual release?  Because that doesn't seem to make sense when the
only way to get it is to check it out of git.

You need to provide instructions for actually checking the packaged version out
of git, not just what's currently at the head of the tree.

I know you probably depend on the names now, but is there really any point in
postfixing the executable names with ".pl"?  It's up to you, of course, and
this wouldn't be the first package to do this, but I've never understood why
anyone would care what language a particular executable is written in.

I note this package provides perl(Satcon) = 1.3, which is... odd.  The module
version differs from the package version?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list