[Bug 461131] Review Request: sim - Simple Instant Messenger

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Sep 4 15:29:34 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461131





--- Comment #6 from Patrice Dumas <pertusus at free.fr>  2008-09-04 11:29:32 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> PD == Patrice Dumas
> MM = Marcela Maslanova
> 
> (In reply to comment #3, #4)
> PD> It is used to link against the library with -lsim at build time. 
> PD> It is not used at runtime.
> Even as used! I'm just delete (rename) it:
> $ sim
> sim: error while loading shared libraries: libsim.so.0: cannot open shared
> object file: No such file or directory

You deleted another file, not the symlink. If you do a 
ldd /usr/bin/sim
you'll see that the .so file isn't used, instead
/usr/lib/libsim.so.0.0.0
is used.

> MM> 1/ rpmlint is quite talkative :) .so is devel file for him.
> I also think in this case.

It is indeed a devel file.

> PD> one have to install the devel package to link against the library.
> PD> The file used at runtime should be like 
> PD> 
> PD> /usr/lib/libsim.so.?????
> In is /usr/lib/libsim.so.0.0.0
> with 2 symlinks on it:
> /usr/lib/libsim.so.0
> and
> /usr/lib/libsim.so

In /usr/lib/libsim.so.0.0.0, there is a soname:
objdump -p /usr/lib/libsim.so.0.0.0 | grep SONAME
should give about
  SONAME               libsim.so.0
The libsim.so.0 is here such that you can have an idea about the 
soname without actually looking at the file binary headers.
The .so is used to link against the library file at build time.

> PD> The source of information, here, are the file headers, and the
> PD> README or the like that should state the author's intention.
> PD> If there is nothing else that 'this is under the GPL', this means
> PD> GPL+
> PD> that is any version of the GPL, and not GPLv2.
> MM> 3/ You need to check license in code and COPYING in source tarball.
> File COPYING contains text of GPL2. It is a file, about I say "included in
> source text of license" before.

If there is only a COPYING, then it is any version of the GPL. See
also question 3 on:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list