[Bug 461303] Review Request: perl-Data-Section - Read multiple hunks of data out of your DATA section
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Sep 6 00:01:29 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461303
Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu
--- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2008-09-05 20:01:27 EDT ---
Fails to build for me (in rawhide); the tests fail due to a lack of Test::More.
Even by-the-book cpanspec-generated packages may be missing a few things. I
added a build dependency on perl(Test::More) and things build OK, so I'll just
assume that it's there and go on.
Otherwise everything looks fine.
* source files match upstream:
57e73cc7ef596d9b65288223daa252fe1e2cb9a07b79f7e8786c86c6b7e4bbb9
Data-Section-0.005.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper (after adding perl(Test::More)).
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64) (after fixing build deps).
* package installs properly.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
perl(Data::Section) = 0.005
perl-Data-Section = 0.005-1.fc10
=
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0)
perl(Class::ISA)
perl(Sub::Exporter) >= 0.979
perl(strict)
perl(warnings)
* %check is present and all tests pass:
All tests successful.
Files=3, Tests=19, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.01 sys + 0.07 cusr 0.01
csys = 0.11 CPU)
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
APPROVED, just fix that build dep so that you can actually build the package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list