[Bug 464013] New: Review Request: findbugs-bcel - Byte Code Engineering Library with findbugs extensions
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Sep 25 21:21:51 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: findbugs-bcel - Byte Code Engineering Library with findbugs extensions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464013
Summary: Review Request: findbugs-bcel - Byte Code Engineering
Library with findbugs extensions
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: loganjerry at gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/findbugs-bcel/findbugs-bcel.spec
SRPM URL:
http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/findbugs-bcel/findbugs-bcel-5.2-1.3.5.src.rpm
Description:
This is a version of BCEL that has been modified by the FindBugs developers.
New functionality has been added, and some performance tuning has been done.
This package is needed to support findbugs. I originally patched findbugs to
use the system BCEL, but my patch was fragile, so I'm taking this approach now.
It seems worthwhile to me to split this package, which is under the ASL 2.0,
out from findbugs proper, which is under LGPLv2+.
The existing BCEL spec file is way more complex than is necessary for this
package, so I rolled my own. Furthermore, the BCEL build script tries to
download some unneeded jars. That's why the spec file just invokes javac
directly. I admit that I am not totally comfortable with this approach, but
since the end result seems to work just fine, it seems good to go with its
simplicity.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list