[Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014





--- Comment #18 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala <huzaifas at redhat.com>  2009-04-07 03:54:55 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> Why are you doing all those excludes? They are listed in the subpackages, it
> should be enough to have them be owned that way. 
> 
Well if you see the file list in the gnome-do-plugin rpm it includes all the
files,  So if i dont put excludes the files would go into both the sub packge
as well as the gnome-do-plugin package.

Reference: 
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/beagle/devel/beagle.spec?revision=1.165&view=markup


> you may also want to move specific buildrequires into the subpackages, that way
> we can do some neat stuff with flags 
> 
Make sense, will do that.
SPEC: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/spec/gnome-do-plugins.spec

However my question is, when the rpm is build from source, you have to build
all the sub rpms right? So what is the point in splitting the BRs?

> Shouldn't it depend on monodevelop-devel, not that it would make a difference
> in finding it. This one smells like a koji error to me, we may need to contact
> the koji guys if it presists or ask the mailing list. Does it happen in a >local
> mock build as well?  
Yeah mock is fine.
Opened a ticket with buildsys at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1315

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.