[Bug 453850] Review Request: globus-openssl - Openssl Library (virtual GPT glue package)

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453850


Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |oget.fedora at gmail.com
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |oget.fedora at gmail.com
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?

Bug 453850 depends on bug 453847, which changed state.

Bug 453847 Summary: Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED

Bug 453850 depends on bug 453848, which changed state.

Bug 453848 Summary: Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE



--- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com>  2009-04-07 13:53:01 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> - Added comment documenting source

Sorry, but I don't see the comment documenting the source. Am I missing
something?


Other than this, there are a few other things I'd like to clarify:

* Why is this package not noarch? (The .pc file can go to /usr/share/pkgconfig)

* The guidelines say:
    If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in 
    its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the 
    package must be included in %doc.

Here, the license file is supplied separately. Is there a reason that we should
grant an exception to this package?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.