[Bug 494647] Review Request: emacs-mmm - Emacs minor mode allowing different major modes in the same file
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Apr 8 18:04:21 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494647
--- Comment #4 from Alan Dunn <amdunn at gmail.com> 2009-04-08 14:04:21 EDT ---
Ok, I the changes (switched back -> %configure, required emacs(bin), added
patch) you suggested, and the new files are in the same locations as the old
were.
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > I have a couple of questions about the spec file:
> >
> > 1) Is there some reason to avoid the %configure macro in the spec file? (And
> > "s/Not/Note" in the comment above the configure invocation if so.)
>
> I actually would've, but I was told by another person ("pre-review"?) that it
> was wise to avoid %configure. I was trying to remember the reason for this, but
> I noticed that I have done this in many of my spec files, so I did it here too,
> adding exactly the options I thought was necessary. If I can't remember the
> reason, I'll change it back. (The "Not" was supposed to be a "Not" - it doesn't
> really matter here, but rpmlint complains otherwise. I suppose this would only
> occur if you didn't use %configure)
>
> > 2) Shouldn't this package "Requires: emacs(bin)"?
>
> Yes, it should, sorry.
>
> > You noted a problem with "make mmm.pdf". The problem is that the texinfo.tex
> > in the mmm-mode distribution is being used, and it is too old (it's from
> > 1999!). Just rm it, and then the system texinfo.tex gets used, and you get a
> > good build.
>
> Ah - great, I'll do that.
>
> > Some of the Emacs Lisp warnings have me concerned, especially the notes that
> > regexp-opt is being called with 3 arguments but only accepts 1 or 2. This is
> > almost certain to lead to broken compiled code. I'll make a patch for you.
> > Hang on....
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list