[Bug 485961] Review Request: gmusicbrowser - Jukebox for large collections of music files

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485961


Simon Wesp <cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




--- Comment #4 from Simon Wesp <cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org>  2009-04-12 03:26:47 EDT ---
@remi
> I agree we should preserve timestamp as much as possible, but I don't
> think this is a must when upstream don't care
I don't think this is a must, so I agree with you; but imho it is possible with
a little maintenance (in your case you solved it with sed) and the result is
more beautiful. :-) And imho if you have to fix some important issues, then you
can do this little thing by the way :-)


* MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines
O.K


* MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory. 
O.K.


* MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
O.K.


+-------------------+
|   gmusicbrowser   |
|     APPROVED      |
+-------------------+

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.