[Bug 495330] Review Request: perl-CSS-Minifier - Remove unnecessary whitespace from CSS files

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495330


Iain Arnell <iarnell at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




--- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell <iarnell at gmail.com>  2009-04-12 14:12:55 EDT ---
+ source files match upstream.  
  c25ed99401dcf4e97d5ead79bfa2915dbbd6284c  CSS-Minifier-0.01.tar.gz

+ package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
+ summary is OK.
+ description is OK.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is OK.
+ license field matches the actual license.
  GPL+ or Artistic 

+ license is open source-compatible.
+ license text not included upstream.
+ latest version is being packaged.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ compiler flags are appropriate.
+ %clean is present.
+ package builds in mock
  http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1291733

+ package installs properly.
+ rpmlint has no complaints:
  perl-CSS-Minifier.noarch: I: checking
  perl-CSS-Minifier.src: I: checking
  2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

+ final provides and requires are sane:
  perl(CSS::Minifier) = 0.01
  perl-CSS-Minifier = 0.01-1.fc11

=
  perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0)  
  perl(Exporter)  
  perl(strict)  
  perl(warnings)  
  rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
  rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
  rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
  rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1

+ %check is present and all tests pass.

+ no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
+ owns the directories it creates.
+ doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ no generically named files
+ code, not content.
+ documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
+ %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.


APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.