[Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703


Matej Cepl <mcepl at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+, fedora-cvs?




--- Comment #50 from Matej Cepl <mcepl at redhat.com>  2009-04-12 15:56:52 EDT ---
[matej at viklef redhat]$ rpmlint -i SRPMS/links-2.2-7.fc11.src.rpm 
links.src:30: W: unversioned-explicit-provides webclient
The specfile contains an unversioned Provides: token, which will match all
older, equal, and newer versions of the provided thing.  This may cause update
problems and will make versioned dependencies, obsoletions and conflicts on
the provided thing useless -- make the Provides versioned if possible.

links.src:31: W: unversioned-explicit-provides text-www-browser
The specfile contains an unversioned Provides: token, which will match all
older, equal, and newer versions of the provided thing.  This may cause update
problems and will make versioned dependencies, obsoletions and conflicts on
the provided thing useless -- make the Provides versioned if possible.

1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

Wouldn't it be better to at least fake some version of those Provides so that
we can obsolete them later (e.g., Provides: text-www-browser 2.0, Obsoletes:
text-www-browser 1.0)?

Anyway, that's certainly not something which would make me not approve the
package.

APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.