[Bug 226557] Merge Review: xfig

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Apr 21 19:35:49 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226557





--- Comment #17 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola at iki.fi>  2009-04-21 15:35:47 EDT ---
Reviewing version 3.2.5-19.a found in koji.


- Other missing Requires:
Common uses update-desktop-database =>
  Requires(post): desktop-file-utils

rpmlint output:
xfig.x86_64: W: no-documentation
xfig-plain.x86_64: W: no-documentation
5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.


MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used
consistently. ~OK
- Quite a few undocumented patches. A reason SHOULD be documented for having
each patch.

MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK
MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK
MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the 
Licensing Guidelines. OK
MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
OK

MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. NEEDSFIX
- Source not available upstream for this release.

MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK
MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK
MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK
MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK
MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package
that owns the directory. OK [fixed in CVS]
MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK
MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK
MUST: Clean section exists. OK
MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK

MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect
runtime of application. NEEDSFIX
- Include in package: CHANGES, README, LATEX.AND.XFIG*, FIGAPPS

MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK
MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK
MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK
MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files
ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK
MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency. OK
MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK
MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK
MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK
MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK
SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK

SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from
upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. NEEDSFIX
- README contains license, which should be added in %doc as mentioned above.

SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list