[Bug 497690] Review Request: perl-HTML-GenToc - Generate a Table of Contents for HTML documents

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Apr 28 01:40:04 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497690





--- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu>  2009-04-27 21:40:03 EDT ---
Looks good to me.

koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1321091

Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (GPLv2+);
make test passes cleanly.

Source tarballs match upstream (sha1sum):
37fc0632800c1f0965e564f2ed1084e3550d3055 HTML-GenToc-3.10.tar.gz
37fc0632800c1f0965e564f2ed1084e3550d3055 HTML-GenToc-3.10.tar.gz.srpm

Final provides / requires are sane:

0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
=====> perl-HTML-GenToc-3.10-1.fc10.src.rpm <=====
====> rpmlint
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
====> provides for perl-HTML-GenToc-3.10-1.fc10.src.rpm
====> requires for perl-HTML-GenToc-3.10-1.fc10.src.rpm
perl(Getopt::ArgvFile) >= 1.09
perl(HTML::Entities)  
perl(HTML::LinkList) >= 0.1501
perl(HTML::SimpleParse) >= 0.1
perl(Module::Build)  
perl(Test::Distribution)  
perl(Test::More)  
perl(Test::Pod)  
perl(Test::Pod::Coverage)  

=====> perl-HTML-GenToc-3.10-1.fc10.noarch.rpm <=====
====> rpmlint
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
====> provides for perl-HTML-GenToc-3.10-1.fc10.noarch.rpm
perl(HTML::GenToc) = 3.10
perl-HTML-GenToc = 3.10-1.fc10
====> requires for perl-HTML-GenToc-3.10-1.fc10.noarch.rpm
perl(Data::Dumper)  
perl(Getopt::ArgvFile)  
perl(Getopt::Long) >= 2.34
perl(HTML::Entities)  
perl(HTML::GenToc)  
perl(HTML::LinkList)  
perl(HTML::SimpleParse)  
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0)  
perl(Pod::Usage)  
perl(strict)  
perl(vars)  
/usr/bin/env  

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list