[Bug 226483] Merge Review: tcsh

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Apr 28 15:50:24 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226483





--- Comment #8 from Vitezslav Crhonek <vcrhonek at redhat.com>  2009-04-28 11:50:23 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> rpmlint output:
> tcsh.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/tcsh-6.15/Fixes
> tcsh.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%postun rm
> 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
> 
> - Convert Fixes file to utf8 with iconv.

Fixed.

> 
> 
> MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used
> consistently. ~OK
> - Some comments could be nice in the install phase, it would make the spec file
> a lot easier to read and understand.
> 
> MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
> NEEDSFIX
> - The license in source code is 3-clause BSD, not BSD with advertising. Change
> License tag to BSD.
> - Contact upstream to clarify this, since CopyRight is 4-clause.

Fixed (I was probably confused with this Copyrigt file).

> 
> MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
> provided in the spec URL. ~OK
> - The file matches but source URL is bad; now the correct url has old/ before
> the release. Switch to newest release will fix this.

Fixed (rebase).

> 
> MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK
> MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. NEEDSFIX

Commented before.

> 
> MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. NEEDSFIX
> - SMP make is not enabled.
> - Use -p flag to install in install phase.

Fixed.

> 
> MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package
> that owns the directory. OK
> - Please change %{_mandir}/*/* to %{_mandir}/man1/*.1, since it's safer this
> way.

Fixed.

> 
> MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect
> runtime of application. NEEDSFIX
> - Include BUGS and WishList in the package. Remember to convert the files to
> utf8.

Fixed.

> 
> SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from
> upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK
> MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK
> MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK
> MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the 
> Licensing Guidelines. OK
> MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK
> MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK
> MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK
> MUST: Clean section exists. OK
> MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK
> MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK
> MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK
> MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK
> MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files 
> ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK
> MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
> package using a fully versioned dependency. OK
> MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK
> MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK
> MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK
> MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK
> SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK
> SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK  


Changes commited to the devel branch. Please check it and let me know your
opinion. Thanks!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list